One can hear the whisper of the night
A subtle sound
A guiding light
The deer’s paws as they hit the ground
Rustling leaves respond from all around
A call of nature
It expresses no danger
One can see the painting of the night
The dotted stars
The moonlight’s bright
A simple canvas, no planes, trains, or cars
Illuminating the reach of nature’s might
In the sky there’s the distant Mars
A wondrous nightscape
Not a wound or scrape
One can hear the desecration of the night
A deafening sound
The animal’s fright
Motors screech and trees are downed
One can see the destruction of the night
Bulldozers spar
Greed’s
Does ought imply can? Does can imply ought? Well, let's look at it from an English standpoint. When someone ought to do something, they are morally obliged to. When someone can do something, it means that they are physically capable of doing something. The two words ought and can obviously have different meanings.
Can someone commit murder? Yes. Is someone ought to? Generally, no. But that depends on the system of morals used. If one follows Hammurabi's code, if the victim commits murder, it is justified under the eye for an eye principle. If one follows Christianity, then they ought not to. If according to Mark, Lisa ought to do something t
One can hear the whisper of the night
A subtle sound
A guiding light
The deer’s paws as they hit the ground
Rustling leaves respond from all around
A call of nature
It expresses no danger
One can see the painting of the night
The dotted stars
The moonlight’s bright
A simple canvas, no planes, trains, or cars
Illuminating the reach of nature’s might
In the sky there’s the distant Mars
A wondrous nightscape
Not a wound or scrape
One can hear the desecration of the night
A deafening sound
The animal’s fright
Motors screech and trees are downed
One can see the destruction of the night
Bulldozers spar
Greed’s
Does ought imply can? Does can imply ought? Well, let's look at it from an English standpoint. When someone ought to do something, they are morally obliged to. When someone can do something, it means that they are physically capable of doing something. The two words ought and can obviously have different meanings.
Can someone commit murder? Yes. Is someone ought to? Generally, no. But that depends on the system of morals used. If one follows Hammurabi's code, if the victim commits murder, it is justified under the eye for an eye principle. If one follows Christianity, then they ought not to. If according to Mark, Lisa ought to do something t
This <-> was written in <-> by <-> <-> to the <-> in order to <->. <->. This document demonstrates bias because <->. I believe this document was written in order to <->. It tells me that <->. I think that <-> is important because <->. '><table border='0' style='font-size: 10pt;'><tr><td align='right'>DOCUMENT TITLE</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='1'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>AUTHOR</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='2'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>TYPE OF DOCUMENT</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='3'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>DATE WRITTEN</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='4'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>AUTHOR`S POSITION</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='5'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>AUTHOR</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='6'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>AUDIENCE</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='7'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>REASON FOR WRITING</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='8'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>MAIN IDEA</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='9'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>HOW IT DEMONSTRATES BIAS</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='10'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>OPINION ON WHY IT WAS WRITTEN</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='11'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>WHAT IT TELLS ME ABOUT SOCIETY</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='12'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>IMPORTANT IDEA</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='13'></td></tr><tr><td align='right'>REASON WHY IT IS IMPORTANT</td><td align='left'><input type='text' name='14'></td></tr><tr><td align='center' colspan=2><input type='submit' style='font-weight:bold; color:#f5f5f5; background-color:#444F9F; border-style:outset; border-color:#B3BBF2;' value='Go Mad!'></td></tr></table><input type='hidden' name='wCount' value='14'></form></td></tr></table>
1. Name: Jay
2. Nickname(s): Midnight
3. Birthday: July 27
4. That makes you: Leo
5. Where were you born: Edison
6. Location right now: Home
7. Shoe size: 12
8. How many piercings?: LOL
9. Tattoos?:None
10. When you wake up you're: Awake
11. When your about to sleep you're: Tired
12. Zodiac sign: Leo
13. Chinese sign: Ox
14. Righty or Lefty: Righty
15. Innie or Outie: Innie
16. School: SHS
Section Two: Looks
17. Nationality: Somewhat Jewish, White
18. Hair colour: REALLY REALLY DARK BROWN
20. Weight: around 140
21. Height: 5'10''
22. Braces? Not anymore
23. Glasses? Sometimes, otherwise contacts
Section Three: Private L
The recent theater massacre is a senseless slaughter. This of course is obvious. While watching Anderson Cooper, I found something he said moving and important. We as people remember the murderers, not the murdered. This is wrong. For that reason, I will not reveal the name of the murderer. He does not matter. He doesn't even deserve the small comfort of being in the deepest hole the world can offer. He doesn't even deserve to die. Because if Death acknowledges him, it is just giving into his sick wish of being in the limelight. He can just become, in Orwellian terms, an unperson. We should remember the victims. In this particular instance, 1
JASHINISM IS NOT A RELIGION. ALL IT IS IS A DUMB IDEA INVENTED WHEN YOU CROSS A STONER WITH NARUTO. REALLY PEOPLE. COME ON. THE STUPIDITY OF PEOPLE JUST AMAZES ME SOMETIMES.